第二节 非关税措施法律制度02（第3页）

Argumeies

ada

adasubmitsthatthe“reasoime”neededforfullpliahereendatisoftheDSBrelatingtothevalue-addedrequirements（the“CVArequirements”）ayexemptionis“11months，12days”，thatis，until1May2001。Initswrittensubmission，adaproposestoimplementthesereendatisthroughtherepealorameheMotorVehiclesTariffOrder，1998（the“MVTO1998”）andtheSpecialRemissiohe“SRatedbytheGoverofada。

otedthatitwasohdrawtheexportsubsidypohemeasures，ioiorequirements，by17September2000，asreeheDSB。However，todoso，ada“drasticallyforeshortesnormallaroada'sabilitytoortsubsidyposoquionthe“reasoime”forimplemeisoftheDSBrelatingtotheCVArequirementsayexemption。

adaarguesthatfortheseaspeeasuresatissue，thenormalrulesfa“reasoime”uicle21。3（c）arbitrationsapply。Agtoada，pastArbitrathesiveofMemberstodetermiappropriateahodofimplementiisoftheDSB，ingthedtimiepsodoso。adastatesthatthe“reasoime”whichithasproposedisbasedonthisrule。

…

Europeanunities

TheEuropeanuhattheDSB'sreendationsgaveada90daystoortsubsidypohemeasuresfoundtobeihada'sWTOobligations。WithregardtotheaspeeasuresthatwerefoundtobeihArtidArticleⅢ:4oftheGATT1994aheGATS，ada'sobligationwastsitsmeasuresintoitywithitsobligatioheseprovisions。TheEuropeanuhatdicatedthatitwouldrequirea“reasoime”forimplementatiosofthemeasuresuicle21。3（adasideredthatitwouldbe“impractiplywiththereendatioely”。

TheEuropeanusthatthe15moioicle21。3（c）forthe“reasoime”isa“guidelihearbitrator，notan“average”or“usual”period。TheEuropeanunitiesarguesthatpastarbitratiohatthe“reasoime”shouldbetheshortestperiodoftimepossiblewithiemoftheMembertoimplemeisoftheDSB。Article21。3（c）referstothenotionof“particularces”thatfluehe“reasoime”。The“particularces”ofeachcasedetermihisperiod。

…

Japan

Japaadashouldtakeallepstoimplementallofthereendatiohin90daysofthedateoftheadoptionofthePanelaeBodyreports。

JapaadahasacceptedthatthemeasuresfoundtobeiheAgreementonSubsidiesandtervailingMeasures（“SCMAgreement”）willbebroughtintoitywithinsucha90-dayperiod，andemphasizesthatallmeasuresaddressedbythePaheAppellateBodyareadmihaivemeasures。Forthesereasons，JapaallDSBreendatisshouldbeimplemeely”bylessdemoimmediateimplementationisimpractiJapan'sview，therefereo“promptpliaicle21。1oftheDSUandpreviousarbitratioablishthataiheburdenthatimmediateplianceisimpractidthatthe“reasoime”itproposesforimplementationisappropriate。

…

Reasoime

…

Asthedurationofthe“reasoime”inthisotbeeheparties，theyhaverequestedthatIdetermiimethroughbindingarbitratioicle21。3（c）oftheDSU。Thus，theissuetoberesolvedinthisarbitrationisthefollowing:whatisthe“reasoime”forimplementationofthereendatisoftheDSBinada-AutomotiveIoArtidArticleⅢ:4oftheGATT1994aheGATS?

Mymahisarbitrationisgovericle21。3（c）oftheDSU。Article21。3（c）providesthatwhenthe“reasoime”isdetermihrougharbitration:…aguideliorshouldbethatthereasoimetoimplementpanelorAppellateBodyreendationsshouldhsfromthedateofadoptionofapanelorAppellateBodyreport。However，thattimemaybesher，dependingupoicularces。

Thus，whenthe“reasoime”isdetermihrougharbitration，theguidelioristhatthisperiodshouldhsfromthedateofadoptionofthepaaeBodyreport。Thisdoesnotmeahearbitratedtogrant15monthsiicle21。3（c）makesclearthatthe“reasoime”maybesher，dependingupoicularces”。The“particularces”ofadisputemayierminationofwhatisa“reasoime”forimplementation，ashasbeenstatedbypreviousArbitrators。

…

adahasplacedgreatemphasisonthe“signifitimplis”thatimplementationoftheDSB'sreendationsinthiscasewillhaveforthe“administrationofada'se”。adahasexplaiail，howimplementationwillcausedifficultiesfoing“majineering”ofitssoperations，underwhichitisestablishiemknownas“sSelf-Assessment”。Thisreformprocesswasbegunattheendof1999，aiooeffectitisscheduledtobeioParliamentthisfall。Thisreformisagprocess，withthefinalphaseofimplementationtobegininlateApril2001，aiemwithtstouethrough2004。Therelevaheimplementationofthisomsadministratiooada&#umentonthe“reasoime”forimplementationisswrittensubmission，adaappearstthattheestablishmeomssystemwouldrequireadelayiionoftheDSB'sreendationsinthiscase。However，iioningatthe，adastatedthatimplementationoftheDSB'sreendationswouldoerasaresultoftheadoptioomsadministrationsystem，ifIacceptthe“reasoime”proposedbyada。

Regardlessofada'sspecifitonthisissue，IwishtoemphasizethatfarelatedtoaheshortestperiodoftimepossibleforaMembertoimplement，withiem，thereendatisoftheDSBinaparticularcaseareirrelevahe“reasoime”uicle21。3（c）oftheDSU。WhileitmightbemoretforenttheDSB'sreendationsinthisetimelihasplahereformofitsinistratiime，thisfaotrelevahe“shortestperiodpossible”withinada'slegalsystemforimplementationoftheDSB'sreendations。AsheArbitratorinada-Pharmaceutits，thedeterminationofthe“reasoime”forimplementationmustbealegaljudgmentbasedoiolegalrequirements。

TheA>

&hatthe“reasoime”foreisoftheDSBrelatingtoArtidArticleⅢ:4oftheGATT1994aheGATSinthiscaseis8monthsfromthedateofadoptioeBodyReportandthePa，asmodifiedbytheAppellateBodyReport，bytheDSBohe“reasoime”willthusexpireon19February2001。

&heihis18thdayofSeptember2000by:

JulioLacarte-Muró

&ions:

1。What'syouropinionabouttheihiscasetoa?

【复习思考题】

1。如何看待世界贸易组织关税承诺表？

2。《原产地规则协议》的核心规则有哪些？

3。技术性贸易措施的影响有哪些？

4。《实施卫生与动植物检疫措施协议》的作用有哪些？

5。如何正确理解并适用《海关估价协定》的规定？

[1]AgreemeIion，Article2（9），（11），（12）。

[2]AgreemeIion，Article2（15）-（18）。